源 稿 窗
在文章中双击或划词查词典
字号 +
字号 -
折叠显示
全文显示
WASHINGTON —In a report to the U.S. Congress on Friday, the State Department raised doubts about whether Israel has in all instances used U.S. military assistance in a manner consistent with U.S. and international law, but it stopped short of a final conclusion and said it was still investigating.
On balance, the report said Israeli assurances that it has been using the materiel appropriately were found to be "credible and reliable." The determination allows the U.S. to continue providing materiel to Israel.
A senior State Department official said the U.S. had not currently assessed that the Israeli government was prohibiting or restricting the transport or delivery of U.S. humanitarian assistance, but it is an ongoing evaluation.
While Israel has the knowledge, experience and tools to implement best practices for mitigating civilian harm in its military operations, the results on the ground, including high levels of civilian casualties, raise substantial questions as to whether its military is using them effectively in all cases, the report said.
The politically sensitive report to Congress came as Israel was pressing ahead with its military operation in Rafah and amid growing concerns about restricted humanitarian aid to Gaza. The Rafah crossing into Egypt has been the main portal for delivery of food and other humanitarian assistance into Gaza.
The U.S. is watching Israel's operation in Rafah with concern and urges Israel to reopen the Rafah crossing immediately, White House National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby told reporters Friday.
"There's going to be more suffering, and that's deeply concerning to us," Kirby said.
No media source currently available
In the past five days, more than 100,000 people have fled Rafah, where more than half the enclave's population had sought refuge from the fighting, said a senior UNICEF humanitarian coordinator earlier Friday. Israel seized the Gaza side of the Rafah crossing on Tuesday.
Israel's military campaign has killed nearly 35,000 Palestinians and wounded nearly 80,000, most of them civilians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. The offensive was launched following a Hamas terror attack into Israel that killed 1,200 people.
National security memorandum
In February, U.S. President Joe Biden issued a national security memorandum, known as NSM-20, that required the State Department to assess and report to Congress on whether it found Israel's assurances "credible and reliable" regarding the use of U.S. weapons in ensuring compliance with international and U.S. law.
Israel has provided written assurances to Washington that its use of weapons supplied by the U.S. in the Gaza war has not violated U.S. or international legal standards in its conduct of the war or its treatment of civilians, including the provision of adequate humanitarian assistance.
But analysts said there's currently no government mechanism to monitor how American weapons are used.
"What we call end-use monitoring is an unfortunate misnomer. It's basically just checking if a munition is in the hands of a designated end user, rather than how that end user is using this munition," said Ari Tolany, director of the Security Assistance Monitor program at the Center for International Policy.
"So it's for this reason that NSM-20 was very reliant on humanitarian and documentary organizations to submit credible allegations of abuses of U.S. weapons, because the U.S. government does not have statutory authority going to be regularly tracking that."
Others, including the Independent Task Force on the Application of National Security Memorandum-20, a private, volunteer group of policy experts, said the State Department's assessment that Israeli forces have in some instances used the U.S. weapons in a manner inconsistent with humanitarian law "continues to inch towards reality."
The task force recommended that Congress conduct strong oversight of arms transfers.
State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller explained that the NSM-20 report examines past events, with the department reviewing various aspects from the previous year up until the time of the report's submission.
"It goes to questions of intent. It goes to questions of proportionality," Miller told reporters Thursday.
US opposes full-scale assault
The U.S. has been opposing a full-scale military assault by Israel in Rafah, situated in the southern part of Gaza. Such an operation would endanger the lives of 1.3 million civilians who evacuated from the northern and central areas of the territory to seek safety from Israel's military response to Hamas militants' October 7 attack on Israel.
Biden has made clear the U.S. will not make available certain types of military assistance to Israel for its use in a military campaign in Rafah. The Biden administration recently paused bomb shipments to Israel, sending a political message to its ally.
On May 1, Blinken held talks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem, during which Blinken reiterated the U.S. concerns over Israel's planned military operation in Rafah. Blinken also renewed Washington's call for "accelerating and sustaining" the humanitarian aid delivery to Gaza.
But investigations conducted by organizations such as Amnesty International, which found increasing evidence of human rights abuses by Israel against Palestinian civilians, have prompted some U.S. lawmakers to urge the Biden administration to impose consequences on Israel.
Position of Congress
More than 80 Democratic lawmakers wrote a letter to Biden earlier this month, raising concerns about the Israeli government's conduct of the war in Gaza and what they described as Israel's restrictive policies on humanitarian assistance.
The letter also called for the administration to enforce National Security Memorandum 20 and its underlying law, Section 620I of the Foreign Assistance Act.
"Section 620I of the Foreign Assistance Act prohibits the United States from providing security assistance or arms sales to any country when the President is made aware that the government prohibits or otherwise restricts, directly or indirectly, the transport or delivery of United States humanitarian assistance," the lawmakers wrote.
"We believe that despite recent advancements, there is sufficient evidence that Israel's restrictions on the delivery of U.S.-backed humanitarian aid violate Section 620I of the Foreign Assistance Act, and therefore call into question the assurances Israel provided pursuant to National Security Memorandum 20," they added.
Others, including Republican House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul and Senate Foreign Relations Committee Ranking Member Jim Risch, have objected that the national security memorandum creates redundant bureaucratic requirements that erode America's ability to provide security assistance to Israel and other allies.
"The timing of its release makes clear that its aim is to placate critics of security assistance to our vital ally Israel," they wrote in a letter to Biden.
On Wednesday, Republican Senate Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker Mike Johnson sent a letter to Biden expressing alarm about his decision to pause weapons shipments to Israel.