源 稿 窗
在文章中双击或划词查词典
字号 +
字号 -
折叠显示
全文显示
NEW YORK —A Manhattan judge said Thursday he will appoint an independent monitor "to ensure there is no further fraud" at former President Donald Trump's company, restricting its ability to freely make deals, sell assets and change its corporate structure.
Judge Arthur Engoron ordered an outside watchdog as he presides over a lawsuit in which New York's attorney general alleges Trump and the Trump Organization misled banks and others about the value of prized assets, including golf courses and hotels bearing his name.
Attorney General Letitia James says the company is continuing to engage in fraud and has taken steps to dodge potential penalties from her lawsuit, such as incorporating a new, similarly named entity - Trump Organization LLC - in September, just before the lawsuit was filed.
Engoron wrote in an 11-page order that Trump and the Trump Organization "demonstrated propensity to engage in persistent fraud" and that appointing an outside monitor "is the most prudent and narrowly tailored mechanism to ensure there is no further fraud or illegality" pending the resolution of the lawsuit.
Messages seeking comment were left with lawyers for Trump and the Trump Organization. Lawyers for Trump strenuously objected to the appointment of a monitor, according to Politico.
James, a Democrat, is seeking $250 million and a permanent ban on Trump, a Republican, doing business in the state.
Engoron, in agreeing to appoint a monitor, barred the Trump Organization from selling or transferring any noncash assets without giving the court and James' office 14 days' notice. The to-be-named monitor will be charged with ensuring the company's compliance and will immediately report any violations to the court and lawyers for both sides.
The Trump Organization must also grant the monitor access to its financial statements, asset valuations and other disclosures, must provide a full and accurate description of the company's structure and must give the monitor at least 30 days' notice of any potential restructuring, refinancing or asset sales, Engoron said.
The ruling is the latest Engoron has made against Trump or Trump-related interests.
While presiding over disputes over subpoenas issued in James' investigation, the judge, a Democrat, held Trump in contempt and fined him $110,000 after he was slow to turn over documents, and he forced him to sit for a deposition. In that testimony, Trump invoked his Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination more than 400 times.
James' senior enforcement counsel, Kevin Wallace, said at a hearing preceding Engoron's decision that they were seeking "limited" oversight and wouldn't want the monitor involved in intricacies, such as how many rounds of golf or hotel rooms they were booking in a given year.
"Our goal in doing this is not to impact the day-to-day operations of the Trump Organization," Wallace said.
"The Trump Organization has a persistent record of not complying with existing court orders," Wallace said. "It should not be incumbent on the court or the attorney general to spend the next year looking over their shoulder, making sure assets aren't sold or the company restructured."
Trump sued James in Florida on Wednesday, seeking to block her from having any oversight over the family trust that controls his company. Trump's 35-page complaint rehashed some claims from his previously dismissed lawsuit against James in federal court in New York, including that her investigation of him is a "political witch hunt."
Wallace said at Thursday's hearing that James' office is seeking to stop "fraudulent activities that are ongoing at the Trump Organization" and wants safeguards in place so that the company can't sell off assets, such as Trump Tower and an office building at 40 Wall Street, that could eventually be used to pay a potential lawsuit judgment.
Trump Organization lawyer Christopher Kise responded that the company has "no intention" to divest those properties, which together he says conservatively have a value of at least $250 million. The "Trump entities are not going anywhere," he added.
Kise argued that James' lawsuit was much ado about common, good-faith disagreements in the real estate industry. If banks that loaned Trump money felt he or the company had acted improperly, they would have spoken up, Kise said.
"There's no problem. There's no case here," Kise said. "It's mind-numbing that we're going to have a receiver insert himself or herself into these complex transactions instead of the owner of this real estate."
As for the new Trump entity that drew concern from James' office, Kise said the company - listed in a New York corporate filing as Trump Organization II - had nothing to do with dodging potential penalties from James' lawsuit, but rather "consolidation of payroll issues that have arisen in other contexts."
Kise didn't offer additional details. The Trump Organization's payroll practices are among the issues being raised at the company's Manhattan criminal fraud trial, which was halted Tuesday and is expected to resume Monday after a witness tested positive for COVID-19.