源 稿 窗
在文章中双击或划词查词典
字号 +
字号 -
折叠显示
全文显示
WASHINGTON —Six months after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, lawmakers have few good options for sending aid to prop up the struggling Afghan economy without enabling the Taliban.
In the almost 20 years the U.S. was involved in Afghanistan, the country depended on foreign aid for more than half its economy. But the U.S. froze most of the country's $9.4 billion in currency reserves last August to isolate the Taliban after they took control.
"There is frankly moral hazard in putting billions into Afghanistan right now," Democratic Senator Chris Murphy said in a congressional hearing Wednesday. "We can do our best to route it around the Taliban, but there is no doubt that the partial effect of aid is to save the Taliban from itself. That is deeply distasteful."
The United Nations issued an appeal to the international community last month for its largest-ever aid ask, saying $4.4 billion was needed as "a full-blown humanitarian catastrophe looms." According to estimates by the World Food Program, only 2% of Afghans will have enough to eat this winter.
"Six months ago, Afghanistan was a poor country, a very poor country," David Miliband, president and CEO of the International Rescue Committee, told lawmakers. "Today, Afghanistan is a starving country, not just a poor country. The reason - I'm very sorry to report - the proximate cause of this starvation crisis is the international economic policy, which has been adopted since August and which has cut off financial flows not just to the public sector but in the private sector, in Afghanistan, as well."
Miliband testified that his staff could confirm media reports that Afghans are selling organs to buy enough to eat amid a fall in currency prices that has dropped the value by at least one-quarter.
Top lawmakers on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee acknowledged that the Afghan people are suffering because of the United States' concerns about enabling the Taliban's repressive policies. But many warned of the dangers of sending aid.
"We of course must continue to be vigilant in our efforts to deny the Taliban any resources - financial or otherwise - they can use to conduct further acts of terror," said Republican Senator Todd Young. "The worst-case scenario involved would be if humanitarian aid were diverted from legitimate recipients towards the Taliban and (their) partners and terror."
The heads of nongovernmental organizations acknowledged the difficulty of easing some U.S. sanctions based on negotiations with the Taliban.
"The (U.S.) Treasury cannot feasibly list every permitted sector in the Afghan economy. Instead, U.S. officials must forbid what is not allowed - for example, arms trafficking," said Graeme Smith, a consultant with the International Crisis Group.
"Unfortunately, many of these steps require cooperation with the Taliban. That is hard, and it is distasteful, especially as the Taliban continue to flout human rights standards. Months of talks between the Taliban and Western officials have not resulted in much progress when the impasse is partly the Taliban's fault. They have resisted reasonable demands such as allowing education for girls of all ages. However, the U.S. is also pushing unrealistic goals, such as an inclusive government."
Smith and Miliband told lawmakers the U.S. could take several steps to ease the humanitarian crisis, including releasing $1.2 billion in the World Bank-managed Afghan Reconstruction Fund to directly pay the salaries of Afghans, clarifying the application of U.S. sanctions in the private sector of Afghanistan's economy, and releasing private assets while keeping Afghan government assets frozen.
But easing those restrictions could be a tough political argument to U.S. lawmakers weighing the cost of the U.S. effort to defeat the Taliban in Afghanistan in trillions of dollars and thousands of lives lost.
Democratic Senator Jean Shaheen said Wednesday, "We need to provide humanitarian assistance to ensure that the people of Afghanistan, the families in Afghanistan, are not starving. And I understand that that means to some extent, we've got to thread the needle. But I really reject the premise that we should enshrine with the Taliban their restrictive relationships with their citizens."
The Biden administration pledged last month to donate an additional $308 million in humanitarian aid to address the crisis.