源 稿 窗
在文章中双击或划词查词典
字号 +
字号 -
折叠显示
全文显示
Amid the crisis precipitated by the U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan, global discussion on how to aid refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs) at risk has led to limited action from Western nations.
Canada has initiated a program for Afghans who did not work for its government to apply for asylum.
Canada said it will accept up to 20,000 Afghan refugees who have been threatened by the Taliban. These refugees are in addition to and separate from those Afghans who helped its government. But no timetable has been set and sources say it would not all be in one year.
The British government announced Tuesday a new Afghan Citizens' Resettlement Scheme, which will be modeled on the scheme set up for Syrian refugees. It will be 20,000 over five years, 5,000 this year. That is on top of entry for translators and Afghan contractors who worked with UK forces.
The United States has had a similar program in place for several years. The Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) covers Afghans and Iraqis who formally worked for the U.S. military and at the U.S. Embassy, particularly as translators and interpreters. A maximum of 50 people a year can apply for visas through the SIV.
However, many have complained that the process was backlogged even before the military withdrawal.
"The U.S. government ... really only had the SIV visa," Deepak Ahluwalia, an immigration attorney in Fresno, California, told VOA.
Pakistan is reinforcing the border walls along its border with Afghanistan. In July, it said it would not accept any more Afghan refugees. Currently, Pakistan is home to 1.4 million registered Afghan refugees, according to the U.N. Refugee Agency. Some organizations estimate that an additional 1.6 million live in Pakistan unregistered.
"We are willing to help, but we are in no position to take in new refugees this time around. The international forces and the U.N. should make arrangements for them inside Afghanistan," Moeed Yusuf, Pakistan's national security adviser, told VOA in a July interview.
Iran has set up hundreds of tents in three regions bordering Afghanistan, Interior Ministry official Hossein Qasemi told Iran's state news agency, IRNA.
"We expect those Afghan refugees to return home when the situation improves in Afghanistan," Qasemi said. An estimated 780,000 Afghan refugees currently live in Iran, according to the latest U.N. figures.
Together, Iran and Pakistan host some 90% of Afghan refugees around the world.
Over half a million Afghans have been internally displaced in 2021, even before the U.S. military withdrawal and consequent Taliban takeover.
A number of European countries said they would suspend any returns to Afghanistan, but some European Union member states have expressed opposition to accepting refugees.
French President Emmanuel Macron received backlash Monday after a strong statement against Afghans traveling to Europe.
"We must anticipate and protect ourselves against significant irregular migratory flows that would endanger the migrants and risk encouraging trafficking of all kinds," he said.
In a video message sent Tuesday, Macron backtracked on this statement and reiterated his commitment to help, especially the Afghans who aided the French military.
However, France is one of several European countries that said it would halt returns to Afghanistan - a move lauded by the U.N., which is pushing other countries to do the same.
Devastating scenes from Kabul have been recorded since the Taliban claimed victory over the capital on Sunday. Desperate crowds hoped for safety and escape at the Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul, where multiple people were killed over the weekend.
But Joseph Azam, a board member of the Afghan American Foundation, told VOA that a vast majority of Afghans cannot get to Kabul or afford a flight - even when commercial flights become available again.
"Afghanistan is a country of anywhere from 35 to 40 million people. Kabul is 5 or 6 million. So, most of the people literally cannot leave by air," Azam said.
The barriers to leaving the country range from a lack of finances to the danger of traveling by land to an airport.
"For Afghans without connections or ... some status that allows them to technically be evacuated or given safe passage or a place to go, I think the prospects are bleak," Azam added.
Ahluwalia and Azam both noted that while the situation is changing daily, very little, if any, movement has been made by most countries to ensure safety or relocation of Afghans under threat from a new Taliban government.
"I had emails in my inbox from people in Afghanistan emailing me, saying, 'Hey, look, this is my information, and I just want to get out of here. Can you help me?'" Ahluwalia recounted. "And the answer is, I can't."
Jamie Dettmer contributed to this report.
Editor's note: This article has been undated to clarify details about Britain's and Canada's asylum and resettlement programs for Afghans.